The role of low molecular weight heparin on recurrent pregnancy loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial Hospital for Women and Children, and the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Department of Laboratory Medicine, People's Hospital of Shimian County, Sichuan Province, Shimian, Sichuan, China. Biogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Provincial Hospital for Women and Children, and the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Electronic address: 24219238@qq.com.

Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology. 2021;(1):1-8
Full text from:

Abstract

To assess the roles of the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The relevant studies of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved, and the systematic evaluation was conducted. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched by using keywords, including low-molecular-weight heparin or LMWH, and recurrent miscarriage or recurrent pregnancy loss in pregnant women from their earliest data to February 2020. Two investigators independently evaluated eligibility. Risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined. To pool the results, this meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model due to the high heterogeneity among these eight studies. A total of eight RCTs involving 1854 participants were included in the meta-analysis involving 963 patients with RPL who were prescribed LMWH (enoxaparin, tinzaparin, or dalteparin) alone and 891 patients who were treated with no LMWH interventions (placebo, folic acid or non-treatment) were compared. Pooled data from the remaining eight RCTs showed the differences between intervention groups and control groups. Compared with control groups, LMWH had significantly improved live births (RR,1.19; 95%CI, 1.03 to 1.38; P = 0.02), and reduced miscarriage rates (RR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P = 0.01). The study suggested that LMWH could improve the live births and reduce the miscarriage rates of RPL. Therefore, LMWH might be a good treatment choice for women with unexplained PRL.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Meta-Analysis

Metadata